CLAUDE.md 4.5 KB

# foodie_server Development Guidelines

Auto-generated from all feature plans. Last updated: 2026-04-29

Active Technologies

Project Structure

平台管理前端代码路径:E:\QtwCode\foodie\foodie-admin-vue
商家端管理前端代码路径:E:\QtwCode\foodie\foodie-store

Commands

cd src; pytest; ruff check .

Code Style

[e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]: Follow standard conventions

Recent Changes

  • master: Added [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION] + [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]

前端多语言(i18n)添加规范

商家端(foodie-store)使用 vue-i18n,语言文件在 src/lang/ 下(zh.js、tw.js、en.js、vi.js)。

添加多语言 key 时必须注意:

  1. 先确认 key 所属的对象层级。 语言文件中有多层嵌套对象(如 foots:{}cuxiao:{}fenlei:{} 等),使用 $t('foots.XXX') 的 key 必须添加到 foots 对象内部,不能加到文件顶部或其它对象里。
  2. 找到该对象的最后一个属性(通过 grep 或阅读文件定位),在其后追加新 key,确保逗号正确(中间属性末尾要有逗号,最后一个属性无逗号)。
  3. 四个语言文件(zh.js、tw.js、en.js、vi.js)都要添加,缺一不可。

曾经犯的错误:AddCategoryFirst 加到了文件第 141 行的公共区域,而 $t('foots.AddCategoryFirst') 是在 foots 对象(第 190+ 行)下查找,导致页面显示原始 key 而非翻译文本。

前端文件编辑注意事项

前端项目(foodie-store、foodie-admin-vue)的文件使用 CRLF 换行符(Windows 风格 \r\n)。使用编辑工具进行字符串替换时,由于换行符不匹配会导致 "String to replace not found" 错误。

正确做法: 编辑前端文件时,使用 Python 脚本(python << 'PYEOF')通过 content.replace() 或行号操作来修改文件内容,避免换行符匹配问题。

CLAUDE.md

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.


These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.